News
Print Article

Barclays fined £42 million for banking dirty money associated with Fowler Oldfield & WealthTek.

16/07/2025

The FCA has fined Barclays Bank UK PLC and Barclays Bank PLC a total of £42 million (after discounts) for separate instances of failings in its financial crime risk management – one relating to WealthTek and one on Stunt & Co. 

  1. Final Notice 2025: Barclays Bank UK plc  https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/final-notices/barclays-bank-uk-plc-2025.pdf
    1. For the reasons given in this Final Notice, the Authority hereby imposes on Barclays Bank UK PLC (“Barclays UK”) a financial penalty of £3,093,600 according to section 206 of the Act.   
    2. Barclays UK agreed to resolve this matter and qualified for a 30% (stage 1) discount under the Authority’s executive settlement procedures. Were it not for this discount, the Authority would have imposed a financial penalty of £4,419,500 on Barclays UK. Barclays UK has agreed to make a voluntary ex gratia payment of £6,281,757 to be distributed among WealthTek LLP’s (“WealthTek”) clients according to the Distribution Plan of WealthTek’s Joint Special Administrators. In the first case, Barclays Bank UK PLC was fined £3,093,600, reduced from £4,419,500 following early settlement. and 
  2. Final notice 2025: Barclays Bank plc. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/final-notices/barclays-bank-plc-2025.pdf
    1. For the reasons given in this Final Notice, the Authority hereby imposes on Barclays Bank Plc (“Barclays”) a financial penalty of £39,314,700 under section 206 of the Act. 
    2. Barclays agreed to resolve this matter and qualified for a 30% (stage 1) discount under the Authority’s executive settlement procedures. Were it not for this discount, the Authority would have imposed a financial penalty of £56,163,900 on Barclays.

WealthTek.

  • In the first case, Barclays Bank UK PLC failed to check that it had gathered sufficient information to understand the money laundering risk before opening a client money account for WealthTek.
  • One simple check it could have done was to look at the Financial Services Register before opening the account.
  • Had it done so, it would have seen that WealthTek was not permitted by the FCA to hold client money.
  • Without the correct information about WealthTek and how the account would be used, there was an increased risk of misappropriation of client money or money laundering.
  • Clients went on to deposit £34 million into the account.  
  • Barclays has agreed to make a voluntary payment of £6.3 million to WealthTek’s clients who have a shortfall in the money they have been able to reclaim.  
  • In December 2024, the FCA separately charged WealthTek’s principal partner with multiple criminal offences, including money laundering and fraud.

Stunt & Co.

  • In the second case, the FCA has fined Barclays Bank PLC £39.3 million for failing to adequately manage money laundering risks associated with providing banking services to Stunt & Co.
  • Barclays did not gather enough information at the start of the relationship or carry out proper ongoing monitoring.
  • In the space of just over a year, Stunt & Co received £46.8 million from Fowler Oldfield, a multimillion-pound money laundering operation.
  • Barclays failed to properly consider the money laundering risks associated with the firm, even after receiving information from law enforcement about suspected money laundering through Fowler Oldfield, and after learning that the police had raided both firms.
  • Barclays only conducted a review of its exposure to Fowler Oldfield through its customers, including Stunt & Co, after it learned of the FCA’s decision to prosecute NatWest over their relationship with Fowler Oldfield.  
  • By providing ongoing banking services to Stunt & Co, Barclays facilitated the movement of funds linked to financial crime.

Therese Chambers, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said:

  • 'The consequences of poor financial crime controls are very real – they allow criminals to launder the proceeds of their crimes, and they enable fraudsters to defraud consumers;
  • Banks need to take responsibility and act promptly, particularly when obvious risks are brought to their attention; and
  • 'In the first of these cases, Barclays secured a significant reduction in its fine through its extensive co-operation with our investigation and through making a voluntary payment to affected consumers at our request.'

Barclays continues to engage and invest in a significant remediation programme to enhance its anti-money laundering control framework.

Notes to editors

  1. Final Notice 2025: Barclays Bank UK plc  https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/final-notices/barclays-bank-uk-plc-2025.pdf
    1. For the reasons given in this Final Notice, the Authority hereby imposes on Barclays Bank UK PLC (“Barclays UK”) a financial penalty of £3,093,600 under section 206 of the Act. 1.2. 1.3. 2. 2.1. 2.2. Barclays UK agreed to resolve this matter and qualified for a 30% (stage 1) discount under the Authority’s executive settlement procedures. Were it not for this discount, the Authority would have imposed a financial penalty of £4,419,500 on Barclays UK. Barclays UK has agreed to make a voluntary ex gratia payment of £6,281,757 to be distributed among WealthTek LLP’s (“WealthTek”) clients under the Distribution Plan of WealthTek’s Joint Special Administrators. In the first case, Barclays Bank UK PLC was fined £3,093,600, reduced from £4,419,500 following early settlement. 
  2. Final notice 2025: Barclays Bank plc. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/final-notices/barclays-bank-plc-2025.pdf
    1. For the reasons given in this Final Notice, the Authority hereby imposes on Barclays Bank Plc (“Barclays”) a financial penalty of £39,314,700 under section 206 of the Act.  1.2 2. 2.1 Barclays agreed to resolve this matter and qualified for a 30% (stage 1) discount under the Authority’s executive settlement procedures. Were it not for this discount, the Authority would have imposed a financial penalty of £56,163,900 on Barclays.
  3. Financial crime is highlighted by the FCA as a priority for retail banks in its 2024 supervisory strategy. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/correspondence/portfolio-letter-fca-strategy-retail-banks-2025.pdf
  4. The FCA continues to supervise firms to improve standards and ensure that they have the right systems and controls to manage financial crime risks. 
  5. Updates from WealthTek’s administrators (link is external). https://www.bdo.co.uk/en-gb/insights/advisory/business-restructuring/wealthtek-administration
  6. trial has been scheduled for September 2027 at Southwark Crown Court in the criminal proceedings brought by the FCA against John Dance, the former WealthTek LLP principal partner.
    1. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/court-sets-date-64-million-wealthtek-fraud-and-money-laundering-trial
  7. Until recently, the FCA has prioritised our investigation into Mr Dance. It was then considered what further regulatory action might be appropriate. The inquiry into Barclays Bank UK PLC was opened in April 2025 and concluded within three months. Barclays' extensive cooperation contributed to this expedited outcome. This, together with Barclays’ agreement to make a voluntary payment, led to a significant reduction in its financial penalty.
  8. In respect of the second case, Barclays Bank PLC was fined £39,314,700, reduced from £56,163,900 following early settlement.
  9. On 4 March 2025, Gr Daniel Rawson, who was a director of Fowler Oldfield, was convicted of money laundering and sentenced to more than 11 years in prison. James Stunt, the Director and owner of Stunt & Co, was acquitted of money laundering charges related to money received by Stunt & Co from Fowler Oldfield.
    1. https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/four-people-jailed-one-largest-money-laundering-cases-uk
  10. FCA previously fined Barclays for failings in financial crime controls in: 
    1. £783K IN 2022. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/barclays-fined-agrees-voluntary-payment-premierfx-customers
    2. £72, MILLION IN 2015.https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-fines-barclays-%C2%A372-million-poor-handling-financial-crime-risks.

Source

https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-fines-barclays-42-million-poor-handling-financial-crime-risks

FINES UNITED KINGDOM MONEY LAUNDERING

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.