An inside dealer faces 380 years in prison following illicit profits of $600,000.
18/12/2025
A federal jury in Newark, New Jersey, convicted FOUR INDIVIDUALS [THE INSIDERS] for their participation in
- A scheme to trade securities based on material non-public information
- About the $3.2 billion merger of two companies,
- Resulting in illicit profits of over $600,000.
The insiders face between 60 and 380 years in prison.
The insiders
- Haghighat = Rouzbeh “Ross” Haghighat, 61, of West Newbury, Massachusetts;
- Kirstyn Pearl, 35, of Aguadilla,
- Puerto Rico; Seyedfarbod “Fabio” Sabzevari, 31, of North Hollywood, California; and
- James Roberge, 70, of Westford, Massachusetts,
Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti said
- Haghighat abused his role as a senior corporate executive, breaching the trust and confidence placed in him by shareholders, to enrich himself and his friends and family
- He schemed together with his co-defendants to illegally profit from non-public, insider trading information.
- Today’s verdict underscores the Criminal Division’s commitment to aggressively prosecuting those who use deception to earn illicit gains at the expense of investors and undermine fairness in the economy
- This is a classic example of greed overcoming honest business practices,” said Inspector in Charge Eric Shen of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service Criminal Investigations Group.
- These defendants took advantage of insider information when they conspired to devise a scheme to provide protected information to co-conspirators for the purpose of enriching their lifestyles and padding their pockets.
- Their undoing came when they underestimated the resolve and tenacity of postal inspectors to bring to justice anyone who commits a crime against the public and the rule of law.
According to court documents and evidence presented at trial,
- The insiders unlawfully purchased the securities of a biopharmaceutical company in Seattle, Washington (Company-1), where Haghighat served on the board of directors.
In his position, Haghighat was a director in May 2023:-
- Obtained material non-public inside information and sensitive deal terms about
- Another pharmaceutical company’s (Company-2) proposed acquisition of Company-1,
- He then:-
- Purchased securities and
- Tipped others — including Pearl, Sabzevari, and Roberge for personal benefit, expecting they would buy securities of Company-1, which they did.
The timeline
- In May 2023, Company-2 made a confidential proposal to acquire Company-1 at a price per share above the then-current market value.
- The two companies then negotiated an acquisition agreement, which was announced in June 2023, causing the share price of Company-1 to spike.
Profit
- Collectively, the defendants profited more than $600,000 from their purchases of Company-1 securities based on material non-public information.
Convictions and sentencing
- Haghighat was convicted of
- One count of securities fraud,
- 16 counts of insider trading, and
- Two counts of conspiracy.
- Pearl was convicted of
- One count of securities fraud,
- One count of insider trading, and
- One count of conspiracy.
- Sabzevari was convicted of
- One count of securities fraud and
- Seven counts of insider trading.
- Roberge was convicted of
- One count of securities fraud and
- Seven counts of insider trading.
Sentencing
- They are scheduled for sentencing on May 4, 2026.
- Haghighat faces a maximum penalty of 380 years in prison.
- Pearl faces a maximum penalty of 60 years in prison.
- Sabzavari faces a maximum penalty of 160 years in prison.
- Roberge faces a maximum penalty of 160 years in prison.
- A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
Source
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-individuals-convicted-insider-trading-scheme
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.