Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC Jersey Branch Pleaded Guilty – the court judgement is available
On the 5th February The Jersey Royal Court Sentenced Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC Jersey Branch [following a guilty plea]
The published judgement shows the following charge:
1 count of:
- Failing to maintain appropriate and consistent policies and procedures relating to customer due diligence measures and risk assessment and management in order to prevent and detect money laundering, as required by Article 11(1) a and (f) and Article 11(3)(a) of the Money Laundering (Jersey) Order 2008, contrary to Article 37(4) of the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999 (Count 1).
Further, in sentencing the Bailiff stated the reasons for the sentence will be delivered on a subsequent occasion. This is an important matter, it represents one of the few cases in this area and we wish to give fuller reasons than normally would be the case.
Details of Offence:
- In the case of two Middle Eastern customers, Mr A and Mr B, between 2013 and 2019 Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Jersey failed to
- apply adequate monitoring of account activity and failed to assess the risk of money laundering adequately.
- In both cases large amounts of cash, in the tens of thousands of US dollars each time, were withdrawn over a period of years from the customer's Jersey bank accounts, without sufficient scrutiny of what the money was being used for.
- The total amount of cash withdrawn was over USD 1.2m (a little under £1m).
- In the case of Mr A, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Jersey:
- failed to detect and react to changes in the account activity;
- failed to identify, investigate, or prevent a number of large cash withdrawals from the account over a period of years; and
- allowed a situation to continue where thousands of dollars in cash were still withdrawn from the account even while earlier withdrawals of large sums of cash were being investigated.
- In the case of Mr B, Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Jersey:
- failed to gain a full understanding of Mr B’s source of funds and source of wealth, despite his status as an increased risk customer;
- failed to keep up to date information on Mr B’s
- country of residence,
- employment and
- state of health;
- failed to detect and react to changes in Mr B’s account activity;
- failed to identify, investigate, or prevent a number of large cash withdrawals by Mr B; and
- allowed a situation to continue where Mr B was still permitted to withdraw thousands of dollars in cash while he was being investigated for exactly the same account activity and there was reason to believe he lacked capacity to operate his account.
THE BAILIFF also says
- Reasons for the sentence will be delivered on a subsequent occasion. This is an important matter, it represents one of the few cases in this area and we wish to give fuller reasons than normally would be the case.
- In our judgment the correct level of fine is one of £475,000 and that is the fine that we impose.
- We also make an order for the payment of costs in the sum of £25,000 allowing 21 days for the necessary arrangements to be made for the payment of both of those sums.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.