News
Print Article

A Swiss private banker and his wife have been accused of laundering CHF 14 million.

08/04/2024

Speed read:-

  • A BOARD member at a Swiss private bank has been accused of money laundering after authorities red-flagged deposits he made to the Dominican Republic. The private banker is charged with taking illicit funds from a customer and depositing the money under his name at his institution.
  • The customer entrusted the banker with the cash, wishing to conceal its ownership to shield his wealth from government authorities.
  • The accused, who cannot be named under Swiss law, was charged with taking over SFr14mn ($15.4mn) in a multi-layered criminal conspiracy over seven years until 2015.
  • The fraud was uncovered after AML authorities in Switzerland raised questions about large bank transfers to businesses in Central America.

Long read:-

Former asset manager and board member of a Geneva private bank referred to the Federal Criminal Court.

The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland has filed an indictment in the Federal Criminal Court against a former asset manager and board member of a Geneva private bank.

The accused is charged with having, between 2009 and 2015, unduly disposed of more than CHF 14 million-worth assets in a bank account in Switzerland entrusted to him by a client.

The wife of the former asset manager is also charged with carrying out certain individual acts of money laundering when she was already aware that her husband was under investigation.

The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (OAG) opened these criminal proceedings in July 2015 in response to a suspicious activity report from the Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS report).

  1. Following a complex investigation, which also had international ramifications, the principal accused, a former asset manager and board member of a Geneva private bank, has been charged with
    • Multiple counts of aggravated misappropriation (Art. 138 Nos 1 and 2 Swiss Criminal Code (SCC)) or multiple counts of aggravated criminal mismanagement (Art. 158 No 1 para. 3 SCC), as well
    • As multiple counts of falsification of documents (Art. 251 No 1 SCC) and
    • Money laundering (Art. 305bis SCC).
  2. His wife, the second accused in these criminal proceedings, is charged with multiple counts of money laundering (Art. 305bis SCC).

    According to the indictment filed by the OAG, the principal accused agreed with a client, at the latest in 2008, promising to manage the client’s assets in an account opened at a private bank in Geneva and to pose as the actual beneficial owner of the funds, which was not the case.
  3. Between 2008 and 2014, the client paid substantial sums into this bank account with the intention that the assets be managed by the accused.

Allegations of property offences totalling more than CHF 14 million

  1. In this context, the main charge against the principal accused is that between 2009 and July 2015, without his client’s knowledge, he unduly disposed of the assets entrusted to him, amounting to more than CHF 14 million to enrich himself or others.
  2. The assets are believed to have been primarily used to finance the lifestyle the accused and his family enjoyed. In addition, the assets were used to make investments and provide loans that benefited the accused or those close to him.
  3. The accused allegedly transferred more than CHF 7 million to support a business based in the Dominican Republic that was in financial difficulties and in which he held shares.
  4. Furthermore, the accused is alleged to have provided CHF 500,000.00, again without his client’s knowledge, as a contribution towards an increase in the capital of the Geneva private bank of which he was a board member, which had been making losses for several years.
  5. while the criminal proceedings were ongoing, the accused allegedly attempted to provide the Geneva private bank with a further capital injection of CHF 500,000.00 and CHF 1,000,000.00 using the assets entrusted to him.

The preceding criminal acts may constitute.

  1. Repeated and aggravated misappropriation (Art. 138 Nos 1 and 2 SCC), or
  2. Alternatively repeated aggravated criminal mismanagement (Art. 158 No 1 para. 3 SCC).

Allegations of falsification of documents and money laundering

  1. The accused allegedly provided his client with falsified bank account statements to conceal the withdrawals unlawfully made.
  2. The accused is further alleged to have completed a Form A falsely by declaring himself to be the beneficial owner of the funds, which was not the case.
  3. These acts may constitute the repeated falsification of documents (Art. 251 No 1 SCC).
  4. Finally, it is alleged that the former asset manager transferred funds of criminal origin from the Dominican Republic back to three bank accounts in Switzerland; the funds are believed to have been part of the proceeds misappropriated (or obtained by criminal mismanagement) as aforementioned and to have been used to finance the accused’s lifestyle.
  5. The wife of the former asset manager is charged with carrying out certain individual acts of money laundering by making cash withdrawals when she was already aware that her husband was under investigation and what the allegations against him were. About these activities, the two accused are charged with multiple counts of money laundering (Art. 305bis SCC).
  6. The presumption of innocence applies to both accused until a final judgment has been issued. With the filing of the indictment, the Federal Criminal Court has sole responsibility for providing further information.

Sources

General

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.