£87m fine for serious risk management and governance failures
In connection with the Firms' exposures to Archegos Capital Management ("Archegos"), the Prudential Regulation Authority ("PRA") has fined Credit Suisse International ("CSI") and Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd ("CSSEL", together with CSI, the "Firms") £87 million for
- significant failures in risk management and governance between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2021,
To access the full report on the failures and the Credit Suisse summary of actions taken, click on www.credit-suisse.com/archegos
This is the PRA's highest fine and the only time a PRA enforcement investigation has established breaches of four PRA Fundamental Rules.
The PRA action is part of a coordinated global resolution, incorporating action by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority ("FINMA") and the Federal Reserve Board, which provides for combined penalties above $387.5 million being imposed by the PRA and Federal Reserve Board.
The Firms provided prime brokerage services and entered into equity total return swaps ("TRS") with Archegos.
- All such TRS positions were remotely booked into the Firms in the UK via other entities in the Credit Suisse group.
- When Archegos defaulted in March 2021, around US$5.1 billion of losses were booked to the Firms. These losses for Credit Suisse resulted in significant financial and reputational damage. Credit Suisse was ultimately acquired by UBS Group AG ("UBS") in 2023.
The Firms' risk management oversight and practices fell well below the regulatory standards required.
The failings were found to be symptomatic of an unsound risk culture within the business line that failed to balance considerations of risk against commercial reward appropriately.
Broadly, this resulted in a failure by the Firms to address the risk arising from Archegos' portfolio, a confusion of responsibilities and failures to adequately respond when limit breaches were exceeded.
The Firms had failed to learn from past similar experiences and had insufficiently addressed concerns previously raised by the PRA.
Sam Woods, Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation and Chief Executive Officer of the PRA, said:
- "Credit Suisse's failures to manage risks effectively were extremely serious and created a major threat to the safety and soundness of the firm.
- The seriousness and widespread nature of those failures has led to today's fine, which is the largest ever imposed by the PRA."
As a result, the Firms breached Fundamental Rules 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the PRA Rulebook. Fundamental Rule 2 requires that a firm conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence. Fundamental Rule 3 requires that a firm must act prudently.
Fundamental Rule 5 requires that a firm must have effective risk strategies and risk management systems.
Fundamental Rule 6 requires a firm to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively.
This all resulted in the Firms failing to:
- Instil a culture within the investment banking division that appropriately balances the considerations of risk against commercial reward;
- Evaluate and take due account of the risks to the Firms and the Credit Suisse group arising from their exposures concerning Archegos' portfolio;
- Appropriately escalate the risks within Archegos' portfolio with the result that there was inadequate oversight in the UK of risk remotely booked into the Firms;
- Take sufficient steps to implement an effective risk mitigation strategy regarding Archegos' portfolio. Including a failure to take reasonable steps to reduce risk when it would have been prudent to do so, and
- Have a governance framework that adequately scrutinised or discussed the risks posed to the Firms by Archegos' portfolio
The Firms agreed to resolve this matter and, therefore, qualified for a 30% reduction in the fine imposed by the PRA.
Without this discount, the fine imposed by the PRA would have been £124.4 million.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.