Print Article

£36k fine for law firm which let millions pass through client account.


A specialist sports law firm has been fined £36,000, and its COFA rebuked, for allowing its client account to be used as a banking facility.

All practices authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must appoint a

  • Compliance Officer for Finance and Administration (COFA) and
  • Compliance Officer for Legal Practice (COLP).   

Onside Law self-reported to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) about $4.1m that was paid into and out of its client account in July 2021 on behalf of a long-standing corporate client.

According to a notice published by the SRA yesterday, the firm did “very little work” for the client on the sale of its minority shareholding in another company – insufficient to justify the money passing through its client account.

Simon Thorp is both Onside Law’s COFA and the partner responsible for the file. He was rebuked for failing to ensure that he and others complied with the account’s rules.

the SRA said.

  • “The firm had subsequently become aware that some of this money did not belong to its client but had been received for and paid out to a third party (for whom it did not act),”
  • “The failure to meet the SRA’s standards arose from a lack of knowledge which Mr Thorp should or could reasonably be expected to have acquired,” the SRA said.
  • “This was not a minor breach of the rules. Mr Thorp had a serious responsibility, as COFA, to ensure compliance.
  • “He failed to do so and as a result, the firm allowed its client account to be used to transact money in circumstances where it had not provided sufficient regulated services, or where it had no contract whatsoever with the individual to whom the money belonged.”
  • Mr Thorp knew that he had done “very little work and had only billed the client a small amount”,
  • “He could and should have known that this meant there was a considerable risk in allowing the client to pay money through the firm’s client account”.

In deciding to fine Onside Law, the regulator said the findings were

  • “Of greater than moderate seriousness”.
  • “The firm’s conduct involved breaches of principles and rules which were designed to mitigate misuse of the client account and encourage and protect the trust in the profession.”

In mitigation, it said, there was no evidence of lasting harm, it was an isolated incident and the firm had expressed insight

The financial penalty was set at 0.8% of Onside Law’s domestic turnover and reduced by 30% in recognition of the fact that the firm had self-reported, co-operated and made some admissions in respect of the allegations.

This led to a figure of £36,517, plus costs of £600. As Onside Law is an alternative business structure, the £25,000 cap on fines for traditional law firms does not apply.

The SRA said a rebuke for Mr Thorp was “sufficient to uphold public confidence in the profession and maintain professional standards”.



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email