
Lord Mayor of Leeds and Wife of Nigerian senator in UK money laundering case with NCA & UWO
12/06/2025
The UK High Court recently ordered the forfeiture of a £1 million property owned by Abigail Katung, the current Lord Mayoress of Leeds and wife of Nigerian Senator Sunday Katung .
The property was initially purchased from MANSOOR HUSSAIN, a Leeds-based property developer accused of money laundering and having links to serious criminals.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) argued that Mrs. Katung used the black market to transfer funds from Nigeria to the UK to buy the property in 2015.
She failed to provide adequate documentation to explain the source of the funds, leading the court to rule that the property represented money obtained through criminal conduct.
It's a complex and high-profile case highlighting the challenges of tracing and proving the origins of wealth in international transactions.
Read the full story:- by Kabir Yusuf June 10, 2025
WIFE OF NIGERIAN SENATOR IN MONEY LAUNDERING MESS IN THE UK
The UK High Court of Justice at King’s Bench Division has granted a forfeiture order on a property occupied by the Lord Mayor of Leeds, ABIGAIL KATUNG, PREMIUM TIMES can exclusively report.
The court ordered the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) to take possession and recover the property, which was originally owned by a wealthy businessman, Mansoor Hussain.
ABIGAIL KATUNG
- Told a UK court that some of the money involved was sourced by her husband, who had been elected as a lawmaker.
- Is the wife of SUNDAY KATUNG, NIGERIAN SENATOR representing Kaduna South Senatorial District, currently occupies the property with her two children.
SUNDAY KATUNG
- Investigators have previously accused him of being a money launderer for major crime lords in the north of England.
She had signed a Contract of Sale agreement in 2015, the year her husband was first elected to the House of Representatives, to buy the property from Mr Hussain at an agreed price of £1,000,000.
As part of the deal, Mrs Katung made a deposit of £400,000 in two tranches: £ 40,000 in the first and £ 360,000 in the second, which were paid to Mr Hussain’s bank account.
UK court filings, obtained by PREMIUM TIMES, suggested money laundering activities in Mrs Katung’s initial deposit, which was made between April and May 2015, several days after her husband’s election and days before his June inauguration as a lawmaker.
The UK High Court investigated the source of £360,000 originating from Nigeria with Mrs Katung explaining that due to the new government policies in 2015, she used the black market to transfer funds from Nigeria to England.
She said her husband sourced some of the funds.
However, there are questions regarding the transfer process, and Mrs Katung did not disclose documentation to prove that the transaction was lawful.
In an oral interview, she told the court that
- Her husband obtained a loan of N120 million from a Nigerian bank and
- Then used a Bureau De Change Operator (BDCs) in Nigeria to exchange naira into pounds sterling and remit it to a Barclays bank account in the name of 1st Resource, a company owned by Mrs Katung.
Mrs Katung sent the court extracts from bank statements purportedly showing transfers her husband made to Bureau de Change operators in Nigeria, who then used agents in the UK to get the money to her via her company’s account of 1st Resource.
The judge held that
- The use of Mrs Katung’s company for the purpose of that transaction was improper but the Mayoress of Leeds maintained that she did that because it was easier to transfer from a company account than a personal account.
The court also found that the majority of payments made into the bank account of 1st Resource could not have been from UK agents of BDCs in Nigeria.
Mrs Katung told the court that in addition to the agents, she relied to a limited extent on family and friends to assist her with currency exchanges and make the payments.
Not satisfied with Mrs Katung’s oral explanation and that of her lawyer, the judge said
- She should prepare her defence and provide an “adequate, documented explanation” of what happened in 2015.
The judge said.
- “She has failed to do that,”
- “It was incumbent on her to take proactive steps to ensure that a properly evidenced account was given to the Court.”
- “Surprisingly, Mrs Katung’s witness statements in these proceedings did not address how the payments were made, nor did they seek to explain what she had said at interview.
- More surprisingly, Mrs Katung has disclosed very little documentation which bears on these transfers, and there is no witness statement from her husband.
- These are telling omissions from which I draw an adverse inference,”
At the hearing, Mrs Katung sought to rely on an attestation from one MUBARAK SULEIMAN OF MY HONEY OIL INTERBIZ LTD, which purports to prove that her husband was a client of Honey Oil and a licensed Bureau de Change in Nigeria.
However, using open source research, investigators said the Central Bank of Nigeria’s list of licensed Bureau de Change as of June 2021 shows no trace of Honey Oil.
Therefore, the judge ruled that Mrs Katung was only
- “Conducting a business in foreign exchange transactions to circumvent Nigerian foreign exchange regulations and/or to avoid a punitive exchange rate.”
The judge added that
- He was satisfied on the “balance of probabilities” that some of the BDCs mentioned by Mrs Katung were not even licensed to undertake foreign exchange transactions in Nigeria.
- “I reach my conclusion on the basis of:
- (1) paragraph 72 of Mr Coles’ eighth witness statement
- (2) the adverse inferences to be drawn from the Honey Oil material, and
- (3) the adverse inferences to be drawn from Mrs Katung’s failure to file a witness statement from her husband and to disclose relevant documentation,”
The NCA contends that the entire property, including the deposit made by Mrs Katung, represented money obtained by criminal conduct.
Hence, the property was recoverable property under the UK Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA).
In his judgement, delivered on 6 June, Justice Jay ruled that the property and its possession should be recovered by the NCA
The judge noted that
- The civil recovery order, which has already been made in the NCA’s favour under section 266 of POCA, should be treated as vesting the entirety of the property in the Trustee.
- “And that no credit falls to be given for the value of the deposit payments made by Mrs Katung.”
Mrs Katung’s lawyer conceded that with this conclusion, his client’s sums in question would have to be treated as “recoverable property” for the purposes of the POCA regime.
However, the judge shielded Mrs Katung from having any knowledge of Mr Hussain’s criminal activities.
The judge said.
- “Understandably, Mrs Katung is concerned about the impact that this judgment may have upon her reputation, and
- I therefore make it crystal-clear that I do not find that she was cognisant of what Mr Hussain was up to,”
The NCA is now entitled to an order for possession of the property, he added.
- “I invite the parties to draw up an order which reflects the foregoing as well as any additional financial remedies to which the NCA may claim to be entitled.
- If the parties cannot agree on those remedies, I will determine them following further submissions.
- Finally, the NCA is entitled to its costs.”
Profile
- Born in Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria, Mrs Katung came to the UK to study at the University of Leeds.
- She is now the Lady Mayoress of Leeds. She took over the role from Al Garthwaite to become the city’s 130th lord mayor in 2024 and the first person of African descent to hold the position.
- The councillor is supported by her husband, Sunday Katung, a serving senator and former member of the House of Representatives.
- “Since arriving in Leeds in 2000, the city quickly became my cherished second home,” Mrs Katung was quoted as saying in 2024.
References
- UK Court Orders Forfeiture of Leeds Lord Mayor Abigail Katung’s ...https://www.lawyard.org/news/uk-court-orders-forfeiture-of-leeds-lord-mayor-abigail-katungs-property-over-money-laundering-claims/
- NCA can recover former Leeds mayor’s house deposit under POCA - Lexology https://www.lexology.com/pro/content/nca-can-recover-former-leeds-mayors-house-deposit-under-poca
- https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/799875-exclusive-wife-of-nigerian-senator-in-money-laundering-mess-in-uk.html
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.