
ANOTHER DAY, ANOTHER LAW FIRM HIT WITH AN SRA “AML” FINE – £63K this time
17/06/2025
On 4 June 2025, it was reported that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) fined Gordons Partnership, a law firm based in London and Guildford, £77,784 for failing to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations for three years.
- The firm did not complete appropriate client and matter risk assessments on several files, failed to carry out an independent audit, and did not maintain fully compliant policies and procedures
NOW, 16 June it is reported another firm, T G Baynes Solicitors, has been hit with a heavy turnover-based fine [£63k] over AML compliance failings that the SRA found continued for almost six years.
- From June 2018 to May 2024, the firm failed to establish and maintain AML policies, controls, and procedures and could not conduct client and matter risk assessments.
The cost of failure was
- A fine of 1.6% of its annual domestic turnover.
- After a 30% reduction to take account of mitigation, the fine was £63,869.
- The SRA exceeded its £25,000 fine limit because T G Baynes is an alternative business structure.
- A further costs order was made for £1,350.
The SRA regulator
- Accepted that no harm was caused by the breaches of Kent firm T G Baynes Solicitors but said that non-compliance had persisted for longer than was reasonable.
- Said its anti-money laundering supervision team had carried out a desk-based review of the firm and found compliance failures that had to be referred to investigators.
The SRA said:
- The firm was responsible for its serious conduct, which had the potential to cause harm to the public interest and confidence in the legal profession.
- Any lesser sanction would not provide a credible deterrent to the firm and others.
- A credible deterrent is key in maintaining professional standards and public confidence.’
The firm fully cooperated with the SRA’s investigation, and there was no evidence of harm.
The firm received guidance and took steps to rectify the issue; policies and risk assessments were updated to be fully compliant by June 2024.
The regulator is now conducting a data-gathering exercise to collect information from the whole profession about AML. This will identify the firms that require proactive inspections and desk-based reviews.
SOURCE
- https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/sra-hits-another-firm-with-64000-fine-in-aml-blitz/5123602.article
- Law firm fined £77,000 for AML failures as half of compliance officers ...https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/compliance-officers-overwhelmed-as-sra-dishes-out-77k-fine/5123465.article
- SRA fine lawyer £78K - one of the largest to date. https://www.comsuregroup.com/news/sra-fine-lawyer-78k-one-of-the-largest-to-date/
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.